Some of the best journals in any field are peer reviewed journals. Peer reviewed journals are called so because they are reviewed by those, who are a group of scholarly reviewers. The journal has the ability to meet all your requirements and acquisitions. The process of peer review is not as simple as you might be thinking it is. There are certain problems that you might encounter before your article is published in a peer reviewed journal.
Sometimes, the information that has been provided for publication in peer reviewed journals can be inauthentic. Sometimes, it is possible that the source you have referred in order to write your article is itself not an authentic one. Maybe it has some wrong information and is not acknowledged by many people across the world.
Poor quality article
You should maintain certain standards that are set by the journal if you want to see your article published. You have to also set standards for yourself so that your article easily qualifies for publication by the peer reviewed journal. When you do this, you will not face any problems that you might otherwise face while trying to get your article published.
If your article is untrustworthy, then it definitely cannot be published. If you would like it to even be reviewed by the group of scholarly reviewers, then you should consider taking information for writing your article only from trustworthy sources. Moreover, the article should contain only information that is interesting. If not, then your article might not get published.
If the information given in your article is not worth reading, then it might be rejected at the very first glance by the peer reviewers. You should, therefore, consider making it interesting to not only the reviewers but also to the general audience.
You would need to have interesting and new results to write about in order to publish a scientific research paper. However, this is not enough. You would have to write a convincing cover letter and address it to the editor of the journal to which you would be sending your article for publication.
Give a Good Introduction
Your cover letter should serve as an introduction to your scientific research paper. It is really important since it is the very first thing that the editor of the journal would go through. You should take time to carefully draft and present the research paper well. Then, based on the abstract of the write up and on the letter, the editor will determine whether your article is worth sending to peers for reviewing it scientifically. Make sure that the cover letter you write is not similar to the abstract. It should, however, sum up some of the main points from your article. The goal of each kind of write up is still totally different. In the abstract, you should concentrate on describing what has been done point to point.
Write a Second Cover Letter
The cover letter you are thinking of writing should have not only a good introduction, but also the kind of writing you intend to submit, contact information and the details of the research group, research institute, and all the authors, who have participated in your research paper, contact information of the different authors, details about the kind of research that is being carried on, reasons why the study is great, etc. If you are lucky, your paper will be sent to the peers of the editor for review. Then, the editor will get back to you with a detailed feedback. After that, you will have to edit your write up according to the feedback and send back your research paper with a second cover letter with the doubts of the reviewers addressed. Then, your research paper would be published.
Generally it sounds very simple that you just have to frame a topic, do some homework on it and have to structure an article, but it is not at all a child’s game in actual. You need to focus on many key areas, pay attention to every small detail and plan accordingly to write an eye-catching piece of writing. So, let’s have a look on how to write an attention-grabbing journal article –
- Think and Plan before you start writing – Why do you need to write a journal article? Is it serving your purpose meant for research? Whether your write-up is matched with that of research contents or is going in some other direction? What all should be included in your write-up to make it meaningful? And have you developed any plan for all the above or have just started writing? Thus, you should work on all these points before you start writing so that you can start in a smart way.
- Read before you write- Reading is the best practice to enhance your knowledge in any field. Hence, before you start writing go through at least 10-20 articles of your subject and if possible related topic. This will not only increase your subject matter knowledge, but also will give you a fair idea about how to make your article full of fundamental contents and updated facts.
- Divide your write-up – Division is not always bad, in the case of article writing it systematizes your write-up and also anchors the reader towards it. Decide and include headings, subheadings, paragraphs and head points in your article. This will give your article a contented look and sense.
- Never forget to add references – Give a complete description of the references used like from where the most quoted sentences are taken, whose task is used repeatedly and do the concerned journal article is ever published in the refereed journal.
All the above points will describe your journal article completely and will definitely grab attention of the readers.
In the organised sector India lags behind some of its new counterparts and the first world countries. Most of the people in the country have been looking for a secured job as the basic nature of people has been to avoid risk. Entrepreneurship involves opening up of new business settings or revitalising already established organisations to respond to any changes and demands in the market.
In the field of traditional art and craft, food industry or distant, obscure villages India finds huge potentials to open up business at small level. There has not been proper skill enhancement and incentives to optimally reap the natural and population dividends of the rural remote areas.
Agriculture being the backbone of rural areas has resulted in workers migrating in huge numbers to the urban areas. It has been observed that in both the cases population is remaining below poverty line.
The policy that has been designed for rural development has to take care of problems by giving occupation to the rural youth. As it has been seen, self help groups and rural markets have gained good amount of importance in the current scenario. Both non profit and profit organisations have been focussing on rural entrepreneurship.
Entrepreneurship through various means has become the ladder for the poor to help them not only economically but also mentally and socially, thereby taking charge of their overall well-being. Rural producers have sustainable market links which can facilitate in their participation to benefit globalisation and also develop capacity to maintain and enhance global quality standards.
There are many sources of potential errors: wrong inputs, programming mistakes, undetected bugs in the compilers and hardware errors such as the random changing of bits in the computer’s memory. It should be clear why it is impossible to verify the correctness of this proof. We could perhaps check all the computer programs there are also the compilers and operating systems to reckon with, but how are we to guarantee the absence of built-in hardware errors or random errors during a run? As for trying to simulate the workings of the supercomputer by hand, the enormity of the task staggers the imagination: the actual search took more 2000 hours of computer time-at a rate of hundreds of millions of operations per second.
It is a simple but fundamental logical principle that from a false premise we can prove anything. If the four-color theorem is false but believing it true we use it to prove other theorems, one of these may contradict some well-established fact. Should no such contradiction ever happen, this would add weight to the computer result.
Surely the use of computers in proofs introduces an element of uncertainty new to mathematicians but not to experimental scientists. This seems a small price to pay for the use of such a marvelous tool. A central issue is the question of the length of proofs. The shortest proofs of some mathematical propositions are much too long for any human being to check in full. Admittedly, we do not know whether there are any important or interesting theorems in this category.
A computer assisted proof would be like the picture of a peak on some distant planet transmitted by a space probe. Our observer may reject this electronic image as unreliable, second-hand evidence. Real mathematicians are in a similar predicament when confronted with a proof by computer. They may postpone accepting the result until someone comes up with a shorter proof, a proof they could check themselves. But they realize that such a proof may be impossible. And so, if they reject the indirect evidence, they risk being cut off from a mathematical truth accessible only by non-traditional means.